The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-8096•Edwin Milton; Rashad Fraierson v. MISS BURWELL, Treatment Counselor
09-8096Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 30, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8096
EDWIN MILTON; RASHAD FRAIERSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
MISS BURWELL, Treatment Counselor; MISS FIELDS, TPS
Supervisor; MR. G. BUGG, Grievance Coordinator; WILLIAMS,
Assistant Warden; PONTON, Warden; CHARLENE DAVIS, Regional
Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-01074-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: June 14, 2010 Decided: June 30, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edwin Milton, Rashad Fraierson, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edwin Milton and Rashad Fraierson appeal the district
court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Milton v. Burwell, No. 1:09-cv-01074-CMH-IDD
(E.D. Va. Oct. 15, 2009). We deny Appellants’ motion to compel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.