The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-8090•United States of America v. CLEVELAND WINSTON KILGORE, JR., a/k/a Poochie
09-8090Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 28, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8090
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CLEVELAND WINSTON KILGORE, JR., a/k/a Poochie,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:01-cr-00123-TSE-1; 1:09-cv-01086-TSE)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 28, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleveland Winston Kilgore, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas
Higgins McQuillan, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cleveland Winston Kilgore, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his “Motion to Vacate and Set
Aside Judgment Order Conviction and Sentence,” construed as a
petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Kilgore, Nos. 1:01-cr-00123-TSE-1, 1:09-cv-01076-TSE (E.D. Va.
filed Oct. 28, 2009; entered Oct. 29, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.