The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-8073•Eugene King v. Orangeburg Calhoun Regional Detention Center
09-8073Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8073
EUGENE KING,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ORANGEBURG CALHOUN REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(0:08-cv-04053-TLW)
Submitted: November 8, 2010 Decided: November 22, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eugene King appeals the district court’s order denying
reconsideration of its order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See King v. Orangeburg Calhoun Reg’l Det. Ctr.,
No. 0:08-cv-04053-TLW (D.S.C. filed Oct. 19, 2009 & entered Oct.
20, 2009; July 21, 2009). We deny King’s motions to appoint
counsel, to compel, for an injunction, for summary judgment, and
to alter or amend judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.