The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-8056•United States of America v. Justin Hawkins, a/k/a Main
09-8056Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 12, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8056
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUSTIN HAWKINS, a/k/a Main,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:98-cr-00016-BO-1)
Submitted: April 1, 2010 Decided: April 12, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Justin Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Justin Hawkins appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based upon the
amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. United States v. Hawkins, No. 5:98-cr-00016-BO-1
(E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 30, 2009 & entered Nov. 1, 2009). We deny
Hawkins’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.