The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-8037•Zane A. Johnson v. Steve Bailey
09-8037Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8037
ZANE A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STEVE BAILEY; ROBERT C. LEWIS; KEITH WHITENER; CARLOS
HERNANDEZ; ROSAMUEL DAWKINS; DOUG WALKER; FNU EVANS; FNU
KIRBY; FNU CHRISTOPHER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00109-GCM)
Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zane A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Zane A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Johnson v. Bailey, No. 5:09-cv-00109-GCM (W.D.N.C. Oct. 23,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.