The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-8008•Samuel L. Coil v. HUBERT PETERKIN, Hoke County Sheriff
09-8008Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 12, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8008
SAMUEL L. COIL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HUBERT PETERKIN, Hoke County Sheriff; JACKIE BREWINGTON,
Captain, Chief Jailer/Administrator Hoke County; BARBRA
MCDUFFIE, Lt. Asst./Administrator Hoke County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L.
Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-00145-WO-WWD)
Submitted: October 6, 2010 Decided: November 12, 2010
Before NIEMEYER and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel L. Coil, Appellant Pro Se. Robert T. Numbers, II,
WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel L. Coil appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Coil v. Peterkin, No. 1:07-cv-00145-WO-WWD (M.D.N.C.
Oct. 5, 2009). We deny Coil’s motions for appointment of
counsel and for a stay. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.