The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7977•Michael S. Gorbey v. United States of America
09-7977Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7977
MICHAEL S. GORBEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CONGRESS; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE; IRENE M. KEELEY, Federal Judge,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin,
Chief District Judge. (2:09-cv-00313)
Submitted: May 17, 2010 Decided: June 1, 2010
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael S. Gorbey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael S. Gorbey appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation that Gorbey’s
claims, which the court construed as being filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), be dismissed. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Gorbey v. United States,
No. 2:09-cv-00313 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.