The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7919•Michael Fiztroy Crosby v. CAPTAIN CUSHINBERRY; CAPTAIN ROBINSON; JUAN CARRILLO, Doctor
09-7919Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 14, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7919
MICHAEL FIZTROY CROSBY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN CUSHINBERRY; CAPTAIN ROBINSON; JUAN CARRILLO,
Doctor,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00366-RAJ-JEB)
Submitted: June 28, 2010 Decided: July 14, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Fiztroy Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing,
THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia; Charles Everett James,
Jr., Brendan David O’Toole, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Fiztroy Crosby appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment for Defendants in this 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) inmate civil rights action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Crosby v.
Cushinberry, No. 2:08-cv-00366-RAJ-JEB (E.D. Va. Sept. 30,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.