Frederick Hines v. Geo Group, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7888
FREDERICK HINES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:08-ct-03056-D)
Submitted: April 30, 2010 Decided: May 11, 2010
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Robert T. Numbers, II,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Hines appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his complaint, which alleged violations of (1)
the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101
to § 12213 (2006), (2) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (2006), (3) his Eighth Amendment right to
reasonable medical care, and (4) North Carolina negligence laws,
and denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Hines’s motion for appointment of counsel and motion “to
hear full and original record,” and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Hines v. GEO Group, Inc., No.
5:08-ct-03056-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 2008; Sept. 24, 2009;
Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --