The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7872•United States of America v. Eugene Lmar Jackson
09-7872Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7872
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
EUGENE LMAR JACKSON,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:99-cr-00001-JPB-JES-2)
Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Lmar Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Lmar Jackson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
his petition for a writ of mandamus in which he sought to be
resentenced or to have his sentence adjusted so that it ran
concurrently with his state sentence. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Jackson, No. 3:99-cr-00001-JPB-JES-2 (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 17,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.