The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7807•United States of America v. Cecil McDonald Davis
09-7807Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 22, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7807
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CECIL MCDONALD DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:94-cr-00370-TSE-1)
Submitted: April 12, 2010 Decided: April 22, 2010
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cecil McDonald Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cecil McDonald Davis appeals the district court’s
orders denying his petition to reopen the appeal period and his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Davis,
No. 1:94-cr-00370-TSE-1 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 24, 2009 & entered
Aug. 27, 2009; filed Sept. 22, 2009 & entered Sept. 23, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.