The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7772•United States of America v. Damian G. Bey
09-7772Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 8, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7772
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAMIAN G. BEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:03-cr-00252-BR-1)
Submitted: March 22, 2010 Decided: April 8, 2010
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Damian G. Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Ethan A. Ontjes, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Damian Giovanni Bey appeals a district court order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction filed under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Bey, No. 5:03-
cr-00252-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2009). We also deny Bey’s
motion to hold his appeal in abeyance pending the United States
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Dillon, No. 09-
6338. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.