United States of America v. Stacy Tremaine Johnson

09-7763Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2011

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7763
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STACY TREMAINE JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:00-cr-00114-F-1)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stacy Tremaine Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-
Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States
Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Stacy Tremaine Johnson appeals the district court’s
order granting relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Johnson, No. 7:00-cr-
00114-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.