The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7760•United States of America v. Michael Edward Jones
09-7760Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7760
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL EDWARD JONES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00123-chh-1)
Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Edward Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Edward Jones appeals a district court order
denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court concluded Jones
was not entitled to a reduction because after considering
Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines, his Guidelines range
of imprisonment remained the same. We have reviewed the record
and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.