The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7714•United States of America v. William Junior Jacobs, a/k/a Boogie
09-7714Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 25, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7714
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM JUNIOR JACOBS, a/k/a Boogie,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:03-cr-00036-FDW-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2010 Decided: January 25, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Junior Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Junior Jacobs seeks to appeal the district
court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion
for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. United States v. Jacobs, No. 3:03-cr-00036-FDW-1
(W.D.N.C. July 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.