The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7663•United States of America v. Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr.
09-7663Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7663
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND THOMAS OECHSLE, JR.,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:94-cr-00057-BO-1)
Submitted: December 14, 2009 Decided: December 28, 2009
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray,
Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Oechsle, No. 5:94-cr-00057-BO-1
(E.D.N.C. July 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. We deny the motion to order officials to
make copies, provide paper and envelopes, and allow access to
law books.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.