The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7659•United States of America v. James Ardell Canady
09-7659Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7659
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES ARDELL CANADY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:02-cr-00127-F-1)
Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 4, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Ardell Canady, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Canady appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction
in sentence. The district court found that the drug offenses
for which Canady was convicted involved more than 4500 grams of
cocaine base, and thus a reduction was not warranted. Because
our review of the record reveals no reversible error, we affirm.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.