The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7643•United States of America v. Rohan Alexander Walters, a/k/a Dave, a/k/a Rohan Williams
09-7643Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 11, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7643
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROHAN ALEXANDER WALTERS, a/k/a Dave, a/k/a Rohan Williams,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin,
Chief District Judge. (2:97-cr-00157-2; 2:09-cv-00589)
Submitted: April 5, 2010 Decided: May 11, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rohan Alexander Walters, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rohan Alexander Walters appeals the district court’s
order denying his petition for writ of audita querela. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Walters, Nos. 2:97-cr-00157-2; 2:09-cv-00589 (S.D. W.
Va. Aug. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.