The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7640•United States of America v. Jerome Harris, a/k/a Jerome Privott, a/k/a Michael Braxton, a/k/a Rome
09-7640Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 27, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7640
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEROME HARRIS, a/k/a Jerome Privott, a/k/a Michael Braxton,
a/k/a Rome,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:96-cr-00260-PJM-1)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Harris appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Review of the record reveals that
Harris would not be entitled to a reduction because even with
the benefit of Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines his
advisory sentencing range of imprisonment would remain the same.
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.