The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7614•United States of America v. Keith Lavon Burgess, a/k/a Buck Black
09-7614Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 25, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7614
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEITH LAVON BURGESS, a/k/a Buck Black,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:03-cr-00107-TLW-1)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Lavon Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Keith Lavon Burgess appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.
Burgess, No. 4:03-cr-00107-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 2009). See
United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009), cert.
denied, __ U.S. __, 2009 WL 2496498 (U.S. Oct. 5, 2009) (No. 09-
5868). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.