The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7605•United States of America v. Clinton Bernard Frazier-El
09-7605Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 25, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7605
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLINTON BERNARD FRAZIER-EL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:96-cr-00469-WMN-1)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clinton Bernard Frazier-El, Appellant Pro Se. Lynn Ann
Battaglia, MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS, Annapolis, Maryland; Jamie
M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clinton Bernard Frazier-El appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for a downward departure. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Frazier-El, No. 1:96-cr-00469-WMN-1 (D.
Md. Aug. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.