The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7505•United States of America v. Anthony Allen Quinn
09-7505Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 30, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7505
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY ALLEN QUINN,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:01-cr-00089-LMB-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 30, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Allen Quinn, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil
Hammerstrom, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Allen Quinn appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing to adjudicate the
validity of his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Quinn,
No. 1:01-cr-00089-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 30, 2009; entered
July 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.