The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7500•Tyrone Hurt v. Department of Corrections of the State of Maryland
09-7500Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 14, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7500
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; ALL
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE FORTY NINE STATES OF THE
USA,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09-
cv-01248-RWT)
Submitted: September 28, 2009 Decided: October 14, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v.
Dep’t of Corrections, No. 8:09-cv-01248-RWT (D. Md. filed
June 2, 2009, entered June 3, 2009). We deny the motion for
appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.