The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7494•United States of America v. James E. Downing, a/k/a Marcus Moultrie, a/k/a Rahmel Lyles, a/k/a Ramez Lyles
09-7494Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 30, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7494
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES E. DOWNING, a/k/a Marcus Moultrie, a/k/a Rahmel Lyles,
a/k/a Ramez Lyles,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:05-cr-00052-H-2)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 30, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James E. Downing, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James E. Downing appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Downing,
No. 4:05-cr-00052-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.