The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7449•United States of America v. Darryl Anton Harris, a/k/a Chub
09-7449Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7449
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRYL ANTON HARRIS, a/k/a Chub,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00005-FDW-15)
Submitted: July 18, 2011 Decided: July 25, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Anton Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Anton Harris seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the
order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Because the district court
lacked the authority to consider Harris’s motion for
reconsideration, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233,
235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010), we
affirm the district court’s order denying the motion. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.