The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7425•United States of America v. Akeem Labeeb Al-Muwwakkil
09-7425Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 22, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7425
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
AKEEM LABEEB AL-MUWWAKKIL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (4:01-cr-00092-RGD-1; 4:08-cv-00126-RGD)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Akeem Labeeb Al-Muwwakkil, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Woodrow
Hoffman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Akeem Labeeb Al-Muwwakkil appeals the district court’s
order denying his Rule 60(b) motion of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure in which Al-Muwwakkil attempted to revisit an
order issued during his criminal trial denying a motion to
suppress. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Al-Muwwakkil, No. 4:01-cr-
00092-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. July 15, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.