The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7416•United States of America v. Lamont David Smith
09-7416Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 14, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7416
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LAMONT DAVID SMITH,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:95-cr-00036-FPS-JSK-1)
Submitted: September 1, 2009 Decided: October 14, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lamont David Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hugh McWilliams,
Jr., John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lamont David Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Smith, No. 1:95-cr-00036-FPS-
JSK-1 (N.D.W. Va. July 21, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.