The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7375•Robert Lee Foster v. DERHAM COLE, Judge
09-7375Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 24, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7375
ROBERT LEE FOSTER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DERHAM COLE, Judge; ALEX STAVELY, Prosecutor; WILLIAMS
MCPHERSON, Attorney of PD Office; DANIEL K. SWAD, Sheriff
Officer; J. L. HALL, Officer; BRADFORD JAMES, Officer;
MYLNER BEACH, Officer; ASHLEY C. HARRIS, Officer,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (3:09-cv-00452-PMD)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lee Foster, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Foster appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Foster v. Cole, No. 3:09-cv-00452-
PMD (D.S.C. June 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.