The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7345•Grant Eugene Ericksen v. Angie Booth; Debra Cottrell; Teresa Wade; Jim Rubenstein
09-7345Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 2, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7345
GRANT EUGENE ERICKSEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANGIE BOOTH; DEBRA COTTRELL; TERESA WADE; JIM RUBENSTEIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (2:08-cv-00104-REM-DJJ)
Submitted: November 5, 2009 Decided: December 2, 2009
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Grant Eugene Ericksen, Appellant Pro Se. John Herbert
Boothroyd, WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston,
West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Grant Eugene Ericksen appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Ericksen v. Booth, No. 2:08-cv-00104-REM-DJJ (N.D. W.
Va. July 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.