The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7282•Cornelius A. Tucker v. Gene M. Johnson
09-7282Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 10, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7282
CORNELIUS A. TUCKER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
GENE M. JOHNSON,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:09-cv-00171-sgw-mfu)
Submitted: September 23, 2009 Decided: November 10, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cornelius A. Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cornelius A. Tucker appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for release on bail pending disposition of
his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Tucker v. Johnson,
No. 7:09-cv-00171-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. June 22, 2009). Tucker has
also moved in this court for release pending appeal; we deny the
motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.