The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7281•United States of America v. Livinson Brumaire
09-7281Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7281
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LIVINSON BRUMAIRE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (4:03-cr-00474-CWH-8)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Livinson Brumaire, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Livinson Brumaire appeals a district court order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006). The district court found Brumaire was not
eligible for a reduction because he was responsible for more
than 4.5 kilograms of crack cocaine. We affirm.
We find the district did not abuse its discretion
denying Brumaire’s motion for a sentence reduction. United
States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.