The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7222•United States of America v. Gary Carter, a/k/a Ya Ya
09-7222Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7222
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
GARY CARTER, a/k/a Ya Ya,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:03-cr-00090-F-1)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Carter, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary Carter appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Carter, No. 7:03-cr-00090-F-1 (E.D.N.C. filed
June 18, 2009; entered June 19, 2009). We further deny Carter’s
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.