The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7182•United States of America v. Emerson Waddell Sartor, Ii
09-7182Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7182
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EMERSON WADDELL SARTOR, II,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (7:05-cr-00128-H-1)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 3, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emerson Waddell Sartor, II, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret
Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Emerson Waddell Sartor, II, appeals the district
court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion
for a reduced sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Sartor, No. 7:05—cr-
00128-H-1 (E.D.N.C. May 29, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.