The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7138•United States of America v. Koji S. Stewart, a/k/a Bling
09-7138Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7138
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KOJI S. STEWART, a/k/a Bling,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:05-cr-00104-FDW-DSC-5)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Koji S. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant
United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Koji S. Stewart appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no
reversible error in the district court’s denial of Stewart’s
motion, and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Stewart, No. 3:05-cr-00104-
FDW-DSC-5 (W.D.N.C. June 9, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.