The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7131•United States of America v. Nigel Nicholas Douglas, a/k/a Junior
09-7131Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 17, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7131
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
NIGEL NICHOLAS DOUGLAS, a/k/a Junior,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:93-cr-00131-HCM-7)
Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nigel Nicholas Douglas, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nigel Nicholas Douglas appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2009). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Douglas’s motion for grand jury minutes and discovery
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. Douglas, No. 2:93-cr-00131-HCM-7 (E.D. Va.
filed June 1, 2009 & entered June 2, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.