The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7114•United States of America v. GIDEON R. BEATTY, IV, a/k/a Bert, a/k/a Kev
09-7114Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7114
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GIDEON R. BEATTY, IV, a/k/a Bert, a/k/a Kev,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:07-cr-00066-IMK-JSK-5)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gideon R. Beatty, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley,
Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gideon R. Beatty, IV, appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Beatty, No.
1:07-cr-00066-IMK-JSK-5 (N.D.W. Va. May 19, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.