United States of America v. Calvin Jones

09-7109Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 3, 2009

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7109
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CALVIN JONES,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:05-cr-00287-TSE-1)
Submitted: October 8, 2009 Decided: November 3, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Lawrence
Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Jones appeals the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part Jones’ motion for a
reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find the district court
did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United
States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion
under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district
court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir.
2000). Thus, we affirm the district court’s order for the
reasons stated there. See United States v. Jones, No. 1:05-cr-
00287-TSE-1 (E.D. Va. filed June 1, 2009; entered June 2, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.