The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7098•Chester L. Hickman, Jr. v. ROBERT MCDONNELL, Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General, etc.
09-7098Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 2, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7098
CHESTER L. HICKMAN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT MCDONNELL, Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney
General, etc., et al.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00163-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: February 2, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chester L. Hickman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chester L. Hickman, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Hickman v. McDonnell, No.
2:09-cv-00163-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.