James Vang v. JON OZMIT, Director of SCDC; WARDEN OF PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

09-7088Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 17, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7088
JAMES VANG,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
JON OZMIT, Director of SCDC; WARDEN OF PERRY CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION,
Respondents – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(0:08-cv-02829-HFF-PHG)
Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: February 17, 2010
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Vang, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Alphonso Simon, Jr., SOUTH CAROLINA
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James Vang seeks to appeal the district court’s order
overruling Vang’s objections to the magistrate judge’s order
denying his “Motion in Abeyance and/or Stay of Habeas Corpus.”
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order
Vang seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Vang’s
motion for stay pending appeal and dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. Vang’s motion for a certificate of
appealability is denied as unnecessary. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.