The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7038•Joe Lee Fulgham v. the Commonwealth of Virginia (doc) Mental
09-7038Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7038
JOE LEE FULGHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (DOC) MENTAL AND MEDICAL
DOCTORS; OBIC HOSPITAL SUFFOLK, VA; TIDEWATER MENTAL HEALTH
SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00089-JBF-TEM)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 28, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe Lee Fulgham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joe Lee Fulgham appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C § 1983 (2006) action for failure to
comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Fulgham v. The Commonwealth of
Virginia Mental and Med. Doctors, No. 2:09-cv-00089-JBF-TEM
(E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2009). We deny Fulgham’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.