The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7013•United States of America v. Michael J. Thompson
09-7013Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 29, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL J. THOMPSON,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:05-cr-00480-TSE-1)
Submitted: December 14, 2009 Decided: December 29, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Lundberg
Medzius, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Kimberly Ann
Riley, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Thompson appeals the district court’s order
denying his self-styled “Motion For Nunc Pro Tunc Order
Directing Award of Pre-sentence Credit Toward Federal Sentence.”
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Thompson, No. 1:05-cr-00480-TSE-1 (E.D. Va. filed
May 1, 2009; entered May 4, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.