The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-7006•United States of America v. Christopher Mitchell, a/k/a Hassan Jones
09-7006Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7006
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver,
Jr., District Judge. (2:90-cr-00020-2)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court’s
order granting in part and denying in part his motion for
reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr-00020-2 (S.D.W.
Va. May 8, 2009). We deny Mitchell’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.