The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6987•United States of America v. Melvin E. Howard, a/k/a Mu
09-6987Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 23, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6987
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MELVIN E. HOWARD, a/k/a Mu,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:95-cr-00123-BO-10)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin E. Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf
A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Melvin E. Howard appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error and
we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Howard, No. 5:95-cr-00123-BO-10 (E.D.N.C. May
20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.