The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6969•Donniel Woods v. State of South Carolina
09-6969Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6969
DONNIEL WOODS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(9:08-cv-03767-TLW)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donniel Woods, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donniel Woods appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failure to state
a claim on which relief could be granted, and denying
reconsideration of that order. On appeal, we confine our review
to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir.
Rule 34(b). Woods’ brief fails to challenge the district
court’s dispositive conclusion that his complaint failed to
state a claim on which relief could be granted. In addition,
Woods alleges no error committed by the district court in
denying reconsideration of that order. Accordingly, we affirm
the orders of the district court, and deny Woods’ motions for
discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.