The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6964•United States of America v. WALTER RAY TAYLOR, JR., a/k/a 8-Ball
09-6964Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 15, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6964
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WALTER RAY TAYLOR, JR., a/k/a 8-Ball,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:04-cr-00195-BO-1)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter Ray Taylor, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes,
Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Walter Ray Taylor, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence
filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no
reversible error and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Taylor, No. 5:04-cr-00195-
BO-1 (E.D.N.C. May 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.