The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6963•United States of America v. Llewellen Fernando Smith, a/k/a Louie
09-6963Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6963
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LLEWELLEN FERNANDO SMITH, a/k/a Louie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:96-cr-00066-REP-20)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Llewellen Fernando Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Llewellen Fernando Smith appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:96-cr-00066-REP-20 (E.D.
Va. May 6, 2009). We deny Smith’s motion for appointment of
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.