The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6938•United States of America v. Joey Lamond Brunson
09-6938Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 15, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6938
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOEY LAMOND BRUNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (5:04-cr-00307-SB-1)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joey Lamond Brunson, Appellant Pro Se. Eric John Klumb, Peter
Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joey Lamond Brunson appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error and
we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Brunson, No. 5:04-cr-00307-SB-1 (D.S.C. May 5,
2009). We deny Brunson's motion for summary disposition, and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.