The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6920•Eduard Lorenz v. PATRICIA H. HARRINGTON, Clerk, Supreme Court of Virginia
09-6920Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 15, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6920
EDUARD LORENZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA H. HARRINGTON, Clerk, Supreme Court of Virginia,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00456-JCC-IDD)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.*
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eduard Lorenz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
* The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eduard Lorenz appeals a district court order denying a
petition for a writ of mandamus in which he sought an order from
the court directing that the Clerk of the Supreme Court of
Virginia allow him to proceed in forma pauperis. We affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Lorenz v. Harrington, No.
1:09-cv-00456-JCD-IDD (E.D. Va. May 4, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.