The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6892•United States of America v. Rennie Otis Price, a/k/a Ronnie Otis Price
09-6892Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 20, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6892
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RENNIE OTIS PRICE, a/k/a Ronnie Otis Price,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:03-cr-00056-CCB-2)
Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 20, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rennie Otis Price, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John Romano,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rennie Otis Price appeals the district court’s order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. Price argues
that he should have received a lower sentence after application
of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). This claim is
without merit. See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247,
251-53 (4th Cir.) (holding that Booker does not apply in § 3582
proceedings), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 2401 (2009). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.