The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6877•Larry Woolfork v. Chesapeake Correctional Center Medical Department
09-6877Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 15, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6877
LARRY WOOLFORK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHESAPEAKE CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; JOHN
NEWHART, Sheriff; MS. BONNEY, Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00273-AJT-TCB)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Woolfork, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Woolfork appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Woolfork v. Chesapeake Corr. Ctr. Med. Dep’t, No. 1:09-
cv-00273-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.